Mind Your Gap between Entry English Proficiency and Graduation Expectation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35307/asiantj.v1i1.11Keywords:
English Oral proficiency test, CEFR, English oral proficiency gap, the English graduation requirementAbstract
In recent years, the trend of teaching and learning English as a foreign language in Thai universities have changed drastically. This can be seen by the changes in the English as a foreign language curriculum and the manner it is being taught in schools as well as in the universities. The main objective of these changes is to prepare students to participate more aggressively in the ASEAN community, where English is the universal language. Thai universities launched a new policy about English graduation requirements aligned with the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR). One area of interest is whether there is a gap between the entry English proficiency and English graduation expectation. Thus, this study sought to gauge the gap between English oral proficiency among the Thai 1st year undergraduates and the expected exit proficiency level (B2 CEFR). Results suggest that almost all 1st-year university students in Thailand have a tremendous gap between the real entry English oral proficiency level and the high expectations exit proficiency level. This information about the gap would allow the universities to prepare their students accordingly.
References
Council of Europe. (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment: Companion Volume with New Descriptors. www.coe.int/lang-cefr.
Cowling, J. D. (2007). Needs analysis: Planning a syllabus for a series of intensive workplace courses at a leading Japanese company. English for Specific Purposes. 26: 426-429.
Gordon, J. (2002). An ESP program for entry-level manufacturing workers. In T. Orr (Ed.), English for specific purposes: case studies in TESOL practice series. pp. 147-160. Virginia: TESOL Inc.
Jarupan, S. (2013). The English Oral Communication Competency of Thai Engineering Students International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 3.
Kasetsart University. (2016). https://offic.src.ku.ac.th/student/news/rules/Eng59.pdf.
Mahidol University. (2017). http://www.student.mahidol.ac.th/newstudent/ manual61/6rules20.html?fbclid=IwAR1ov5t3vy311M9ANU_C8gA7GhlJPLzIw 5ynzaYWxopQYKYXTW4dTOpFGs.
Ministry of Education, Thailand (2016). English Language Reforming Policy. file:///C:/Users/HP/AppData/Local/Temp/5705140101.pdf.
OECD/UNESCO (2016), Education in Thailand: An OECD-UNESCO Perspectiv Reviews of National Policies for Education, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264259119-en
Office of the Higher Education Commission of Thailand (2016). Bangkok.
Orsi, L.and Orsi, P. 2002. An ESP program for brewers. In T. Orr (Ed.). English for Specific Purposes: case studies in TESOL practice series. Verginia : TESOL. Inc., 175-188.
Prachanant, N. (2012). Needs Analysis on English Language Use in Tourism Industry. Elsevier Ltd.
Prince of Songkla University. (2016). http://www.mcs.sat.psu.ac.th/file/engBsc.pdf.
Riemer, M.J. (2002). English and Communication Skills for the Global Engineer. Global Journal of Engineering Education. 6 (1): 91-100.
Rochanasak, S., Klinjuy R., Samanit, S., and Nilamai, V. (2019). Essential Skills for Thailand 4.0: The Importance of Education Corresponded to Employment Scenarios, and Building Self-Competent Immunity Pertaining to Technological Disruptions. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University. Humanities, Social Sciences, and Arts Volume 12 Number 3 May-June 2019.
Thammasat University. (2017). Annual Report. https://reg.siit.tu.ac.th/registrar.pdf.
The National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organisation). (2019). http://www.niets.or.th/en/
University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations. (2009). Example of Speaking Performance at CEFR Levels A2 to C2.
Wei, X., & Chung, J. (2019). Analyzing Expectations of Business Administrators on Key Skills Required for Entry-Level Jobs in Thailand. Journal of Global Business Review Vol. 21 No.1 January –June 2019.
Yasin, A., W. Shaupil, A. Mukhtar, N. Ghani and F. Rashid. (2010). The English proficiency of Civil Engineering students at a Malaysian polytechnic. Asian Social Science. 6 (6): 161-170.
Yin, K. M. (1988). ESP for engineers: a reassessment. ESL Journal. 42(2): 102-108
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Uraiwan Sae-Ong, Shaik Abdul Malik Mohamed Ismail

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

